In a data warehouse, which scenario is the best example of a slowly changing dimension that does not retain history?

Enhance your skills with the CompTIA Data+ Certification Test. Engage with flashcards, tackle challenging multiple choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Get yourself exam-ready now!

Multiple Choice

In a data warehouse, which scenario is the best example of a slowly changing dimension that does not retain history?

Explanation:
When a dimension attribute changes and you don’t keep the old value, you’re using a Type 1 slowly changing dimension. Overwriting the existing value in the dimension row means the previous value is lost and no history is retained. The address example fits this; when the address updates, the old address is replaced with the new one, so you don’t have a history of past addresses. This is exactly the behavior of a no-history SCD. Other approaches would preserve history (like adding a new row for each change or keeping a separate history table) or simply purge data, but they don’t illustrate the no-history overwrite pattern.

When a dimension attribute changes and you don’t keep the old value, you’re using a Type 1 slowly changing dimension. Overwriting the existing value in the dimension row means the previous value is lost and no history is retained. The address example fits this; when the address updates, the old address is replaced with the new one, so you don’t have a history of past addresses. This is exactly the behavior of a no-history SCD.

Other approaches would preserve history (like adding a new row for each change or keeping a separate history table) or simply purge data, but they don’t illustrate the no-history overwrite pattern.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy